Who TF is B Howard and why should anyone care?
- morganjackson1997
- Dec 6, 2025
- 3 min read
Most recently, [12/04/2025] I was engaged with someone who claims to be a reporter. She stakes a lot of her career on this story that Michael Jackson had a Biological child no one knew about at the time. She bases the story off the song "Billie Jean" which Michael himself has already talked about in interviews, his book, and even Jermaine's book talks about it a bit.
All indicate that the song is simply based on multiple women from here and there who genuinely were trying to use their babies to force their way into Michael's life for one reason or another, most often money or fame.
After being told to "google the article" about B Howard's DNA test, the search simply yeilded tabloid after tabloid after AI slop after tabloid..... Tabloids aren’t sources. Regurgitating tabloid information just makes you a tabloid. That’s why I got 30 articles and 10 ai slop essays with the identical information nearly verbatim. Not like they had access to the same source but more like they hit CTRL+A, CTRL+C, CTRL+V, and did a little sprucing or asked AI to do the sprucing. And also, no sources, no links, weird obviously fake photos, lots of questions raised and all conveniently include words like "called into question" "Debunked" "uncertain" stuff to indicate that it might not be true, in case the truth ever comes out. For now, they spin one story as false as the rest of the BS rumors that caused Michael to say "don't buy them, don't read them, burn them." Source: trust me bro. How was the DNA verified? Is this envelope “acknowledgement” witnessed or verified by anyone? Source: trust me bro.
Pearl Jr likes to use the phrase “Just words comin outta people’s mouths!” Well these are just words written down, and in some cases generated instead, in a tabloid article which means absolutely nothing as we already know tabloids take one pretend detail and spin it into something that will sell. What sells? Michael Jackson’s name. That’s all there is to this B Howard nonsense relating him to Michael. Tabloids, “trust me bro”s, and regurgitated consistency of slop. Regurgitated slop is still slop. If Pearl is citing all of these articles and can’t give genuine sources for them, what kind of reporter is that? Ding ding!! a TABLOID!!
You wanna see a few?
How about this one where Miki further denies and is sick of hearing about it?
this one with no sources or explanations?
This one with no sources and an alleged quote from forever ago?
This AI slop one generated 3 weeks ago?
A very common theme is the word “allegedly”, a lack of bibliography or verifiable sources of this information, photos with big headlines that even contradict the article at times [saying like “it’s reality” or “he’s my dad” and two minutes later “Is he my dad?” while the article includes the results being alleged or debunked etc]
The last I heard from someone connected to the Jacksons, he’s Joe’s kid. Even I can’t verify that, but there’s no real evidence he’s Michael’s either.
So what about this guy should we actually even be concerned with?
Maybe his antics.
He’s not been a very good person according to these, very real, witnesses of it.
Doesn’t matter who his daddy is. He needs calling out for WHAT he is. He clearly does NOT embody Michael in any ways that genuinely matter. so. just ignore this guy. he's not worth anyones time, and worse, possibly dangerous.
Comments